Comparison

Coinflux vs the crypto payment gateways

Most iGaming crypto processors — Alphapo, CoinsPaid, NOWPayments, Cryptomus — are custodial and take a percentage of every transaction. Coinflux is non-custodial and flat monthly. Here’s the side-by-side.

CoinfluxAlphapoCoinsPaidNOWPaymentsCryptomus
Custody modelNon-custodialCustodialCustodialCustodialCustodial
Holds your fundsNo — neverYesYesYesYes
Pricing modelFlat monthly% per transaction% per transaction% per transaction% per transaction
Transaction fee0%1% + $0.25~0.8%0.3–0.5%0.4–2%
Monthly cost$71–$242 flatNegotiatedNoneNoneNone
Double-credit protectionIdempotent ledgerNot documentedNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Built for iGamingYesYesYesGeneralGeneral

Competitor fees are their publicly listed rates (2026) and vary by volume; verify current terms with each provider.

Why flat + non-custodial wins at volume

A percentage fee looks small until you run volume. At $1,000,000/month, a 0.8% processor costs ~$8,000/month. Coinflux’s Growth plan is $242 flat — the same infrastructure, without a tax on every deposit. The more you process, the wider the gap.

Custody is the other half. Custodial processors hold your funds in hot wallets — convenient until they’re drained. Alphapo, a custodial gateway, lost roughly $60M to a hot-wallet hack in 2023. Coinflux is non-custodial: you configure only an xpub, funds land in wallets only you control, and Coinflux can never move a cent. There’s no honeypot to hack.

You still get the hard engineering — real-time chain watching, an idempotent ledger that makes double-credits mathematically impossible, deterministic EXACT/UNDER/OVER handling, and signed webhooks — just without the custody risk or the percentage cut.